Author: media manager

The European Pharmacopoeia has published significant revisions to its standards for pharmaceutical water in Ph. Eur. Issue  12.3, affecting WATER FOR INJECTIONS (0169), WATER, PURIFIED (0008), and TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON IN WATER FOR PHARMACEUTICAL USE (2.2.44). These changes represent a major step toward international harmonization, particularly with the USP, by adopting state-of-the-art testing methodologies.

Transition to TOC Testing for Sterilised Water (SWFI)

The most notable regulatory shift is the complete replacement of the traditional test for oxidisable substances with the Total Organic Carbon (TOC) test for Sterilised Water for Injections (SWFI). This is facilitated by the addition of Method B to General Chapter 2.2.44, which is specifically designed for SWFI. Notably, Method B introduces container-dependent TOC limits, defining three different acceptance criteria based on the size of the container.

Refinements for Bulk Water (WFI and Purified)

For both Water for Injections and Purified Water in bulk, the revisions focus on clarification and alignment without introducing entirely new content requirements:

  • Methodological Consistency: for the TOC test in bulk water, the monographs now explicitly refer to Method A of Chapter 2.2.44.
  • Numerical Precision: the TOC limit value has been updated from 0.5 mg/L to 50 mg/L to align with the concentration of the standards used in the general chapter.
  • Conductivity Calibration: a metrological clarification has been added to the conductivity test. The accuracy of the measurement and the permissible deviation during system calibration must now be based on the expected conductivity value of the reference solution rather than the measured value.

Reagents and Implementation

To simplify laboratory processes and enable the use of USP reference standards, the reagents sucrose R and 1,4-benzoquinone R are being replaced by Chemical Reference Substances (CRSs).

These revised monographs are scheduled to officially come into force on 1 July 2026

 

SOURCES:

European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Issue 12.3

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S) have proposed a targeted revision of Annex 15 of the Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines. The concept paper proposes the transition of Annex 15 from its current status as optional supplementary guidance for active substance (AS) manufacturers to a mandatory requirement. This new scope will encompass manufacturers of both chemical and biological active substances.

The proposal stems from lessons learnt from the presence of N-nitrosamine impurities in sartan medicines, which was made public in June 2020. Investigations into these cases revealed that the contamination was often due to gaps in knowledge of processes and products, as well as GMP deficiencies among active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturers. By making Annex 15 mandatory, regulatory authorities aim to ensure better contamination control and a more robust investigation of quality issues.

The revision intends to align validation practices with quality standards and includes several critical updates:

  • Quality Risk Management (QRM): validation and qualification activities will be updated to align with the revised ICH Q9 (R1) guideline, emphasizing the use of QRM throughout the product lifecycle, including the design of monitoring systems.
  • Enhanced Documentation: AS manufacturers will be expected to adopt the concepts of the “Validation Master File” and “Qualification and Validation policy” to improve how activities are defined and documented.
  • Process Oversight: the new guidelines will focus on sound process development, stricter change control as part of knowledge management, and more rigorous supplier qualification.
  • Qualification Stages: concepts such as User Requirements Specifications (URS) and Factory/Site Acceptance Testing (FAT/SAT) will be formally extended to AS manufacturing.
  • Transport and Distribution: in line with Good Distribution Practices (GDP), the revision will provide guidance on verifying transportation to ensure that the quality of active substances is not compromised during transit.

Implementation Timeline

The revision process is already underway. A public consultation period is scheduled from February 9 to April 9, 2026. Following the review of comments and final endorsements, the European Commission is expected to publish the finalized guideline by December 2026.

SOURCES:

concept-paper-revision-guidelines-good-manufacturing-practice-medicinal-products-annex-15-qualification-validation_en.pdf

The Committee of Experts on the Classification of Medicines as Regards their Supply (CD-P-PH/PHO), co-ordinated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), has just published five new evidence-based classification reviews (EBRs) on herbal medicines.

The five new ERBs, drafted in 2025, concern the following herbal substances:

  • castor oil (Ricinus oleum);
  • St John’s wort (Hypericum herba);
  • capsicum (Capsicum);
  • ivy leaf (Hedera helix folium);
  • agnus castus fruit (Agni casti fructus).

The CD-P-PH/PHO adopted a new format for EBRs following the roll-out of the recently developed assessment approach described in the new guidelines on the classification of active pharmaceutical substances as regards their supply.

The CD-P-PH/PHO issues a recommendation for a non-prescription status or exemptions to a prescription-only status if the benefits clearly outweigh the risks, as demonstrated by in-depth Evidence-Based Classification Reviews (EBR).

The EBRs are published on the CD-P-PH/PHO Programme results web page, maintained by the EDQM. More information is available in the EDQM Newsroom.

 

SOURCES:

https://www.edqm.eu/en/-/cd-p-ph/pho-publishes-5-new-evidence-based-classification-reviews

On October 27, 2025, the European Commission released two new implementing regulations on good manufacturing practices (GMP) in the veterinary field:

  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2091(for GMP of finished products)
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2154(for GMP of active substances used as starting materials).

The new Implementing Regulations set out the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements introduced by Regulation (EU) 2019/6 on veterinary medicinal products and will have to be fully applied from July 16, 2026.

The Regulations apply to manufacturers, importers, repackagers, and relabelers of active substances and medicinal products for veterinary use.

These regulations provide a specific framework and GMP requirements with their own separate legal basis within veterinary legislation, replacing the current GMP provisions for veterinary medicinal products and their active substances laid down in Volume 4 of EudraLex, which are currently aligned with the GMP framework for medicinal products for human use.

To support stakeholders, the European Commission has also issued correlation tables linking each Implementing Regulation to the existing GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products and active substances, providing clear indication on how the new rules relate to the current regulatory framework.

The regulation applies to manufacturers, importers, repackagers, and re-labellers of active substances for veterinary use.

SOURCES:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=27102025

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published draft guidance entitled “Medical Gases—Current Good Manufacturing Practice” to help manufacturers of medical gases comply with tailored current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) requirements (codified in 21 CFR part 213), that become effective on December 18, 2025.

The conforming amendments to the cGMP requirements for combination products will take effect on February 2, 2026.

This new draft guidance amends and replaces the draft guideline entitled “Current Good Manufacturing Practices for Medical Gases” published in June 2017, and has been drafted to reflect new and revised regulations in various areas, with the aim of reducing, as appropriate, the regulatory burden for the medical gas industry.

Unlike standard pharmaceuticals, medical gases have unique production, storage, and distribution characteristics (e.g. sealed pressurised systems, reusable cylinders, and no typical ‘expiration’ concerns).

These regulations contain the minimum requirements to ensure that manufacturing processes operate according to acceptable quality standards, but are more specifically tailored to the methods of manufacturing, packaging, labeling, storage, and distribution of medical gases.

In addition to aligning with the unique nature of medical gases, the updated regulations include certification and labeling requirements (e.g., warnings statements on oxygen containers) and modified safety reporting provisions.

Comments on the draft guidance may be submitted in electronic or paper format by January 30, 2026.

 

 

SOURCES:

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/medical-gases-current-good-manufacturing-practice

On October 29, 2025, the FDA published new draft guidance titled “Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product: Updated Recommendations for Assessing the Need for Comparative Efficacy Studies.” The draft guidance includes the recommendations of the FDA in cases where sponsors should consider a simplified approach to biosimilar development and therefore waive conducting a clinical efficacy study to support of a biosimilar application.

This draft guidance highlights recommendations for demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product, pointing out that following comparative analytical testing, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) testing, and in the presence of a clinical immunogenicity assessment demonstrating a high degree of similarity and the absence of clinically significant differences between the proposed product and the reference product, Comparative Efficacy Studies (CES) are not necessary.

The FDA advises considering a simplified approach when:

  • the reference product and proposed biosimilar product are manufactured from clonal cell lines, are highly purified, and can be well-characterized analytically;
  • the relationship between quality attributes and clinical efficacy is generally understood for the reference product, and these attributes can be evaluated by assays included in the CAA;
  • a human pharmacokinetic similarity study is feasible and clinically relevant.

Comparative efficacy studies are therefore only needed to resolve cases of “residual uncertainty” or for products for which clinical endpoints or PK data are not feasible or clinically relevant.

The new draft guidance indicates that the agency now considers comparative clinical efficacy studies to be the exception rather than the rule for biosimilar development programs, at least for therapeutic protein products.

SOURCES:

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/scientific-considerations-demonstrating-biosimilarity-reference-product-updated-recommendations

 

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) has revised the “Guideline on requirements for revision and renewal of certificates of suitability to the European Pharmacopoeia monographs” (PA/PH/CEP (04) 02) to introduced new e-submission requirements for CEP applications,  marking a step toward more automated, accurate and efficient processes.

The draft revised guideline is now available for public consultation until January 16, 2026. After the consultation phase, the final guideline will be posted on the EDQM website.

As of 1 November 2025, the EDQM will implement automation to streamline CEP submission processes. As part of this change, the EDQM will require that applications submitted with electronic common technical document (eCTD) be validated according to the latest EU regional criteria. Applicants must now perform the task using an appropriate eCTD validation tool.

The Directorate has provided some rules for file naming and placemement for the submission of the validation report and instructions on file format requirements.

To ensure smooth submission of applications, the EDQM has also updated the guidelines (PA/PH/CEP (13) 67 R3) on the use of the Common European Submission Portal (CESP) to reflect all the changes made.

 

SOURCES:

https://www.edqm.eu/en/-/changes-to-e-submission-requirements-for-cep-applications

 

Revision of Chapter 4 – Documentation

Chapter 4 has been revised to underline the importance of documentation in GMP compliance and incorporate support for new technologies, hybrid solutions, and new services in documentation management. Risk management principles are now focused and integrated into the data governance system to ensure the accuracy, integrity, availability, and legibility of documents in all types of formats (paper, digital, or hybrid).  The guideline also clarifies the requirements for managing electronic records, signatures, and data integrity, ensuring consistency with the concurrent revision of Annex 11.

Revision of Annex 11 – Computerised Systems

The revision of Annex 11 introduces stricter requirements for the life cycle management of computerized systems, requiring the full application of Quality Risk Management principles during all steps. The updated provisions consolidate the obligations relating to the definition and ongoing maintenance of system requirements and the oversight of suppliers and external service providers. Furthermore, the controls relating to data integrity, audit trails, electronic signatures, and system security have also been tightened.

New Annex 22 – Artificial Intelligence

The new annex about Artificial Intelligence sets out requirements for the use of AI and machine learning in the manufacturing of active substances and medicinal products and defines requirements for the selection, training and validation of AI models. Aspects related to defining the intended use of the model, defining performance metrics, the quality of model training data, and the management and processing of test data have been explored in depth. The document also provides for continuous oversight of AI systems, including change control, model performance monitoring, and human review procedures.

Taken together, these three documents aim to provide a comprehensive and robust framework that supports the implementation of information technology in pharmaceutical manufacturing, while maintaining product quality and patient safety.

SOURCES:

https://health.ec.europa.eu/consultations/stakeholders-consultation-eudralex-volume-4-good-manufacturing-practice-guidelines-chapter-4-annex_en

1079.5 Transportation Lane Temperature Mapping and Qualification

The General Chapters—Packaging and Distribution Expert Committee has proposed a new chapter addressing the evaluation and qualification of transportation routes to ensure appropriate storage conditions during distribution.

The transportation environment is critical to product preservation and is often outside the direct control of the shipper, including manufacturers, distributors, freight forwarders, and healthcare providers.

It is well known that transport presents specific risks due to the environmental variability to which the products may be exposed and the limited control through the distribution network.

This chapter outlines best practices for temperature lane mapping and transport route qualification to ensure the integrity of pharmaceutical products.

This new chapter formalizes lane-level risk management in pharmaceutical distribution and will have a direct impact on logistics service providers, distributors and manufacturers relying on ambient or temperature-controlled transport, requiring more rigorous oversight and documented evidence of distribution integrity.

Companies must establish mapping protocols, qualify critical routes, and integrate lane performance into their GDP and change control systems to ensure smooth operations.

Also published in this issue of PF is a Stimuli article, Transportation Lane Temperature Mapping and Qualification—Risk Identification and Evaluation, that provides additional background and context for the development of this chapter.

 

SOURCES:

The complete draft is available on the official USP website. Public comments are accepted until 30 November 2025

The European Pharmacopoeia has revised chapter 3.2.1. “Glass containers for pharmaceutical use”.

The revision was issued to clarify the purpose of tests A, B, and C used to define the type of glass and characterize the hydrolytic resistance of the glass. The presentation of the information (Table 3.2.1-1) has been modified to add further details about each test and its respective purpose.

The second update concerns the approach used to determine the maximum transmission limit for colored glass containers. Since the light protection or light transmission of a coloured glass depends on the wall thickness of the containers, it was decided to base the determination of the maximum spectral transmission and related specifications on the wall thickness insteadof the volume and closure system of the containers. The proposed limits take into account detailed data on containers available on the European market.

SOURCES:

https://www.edqm.eu/en/-/ph.-eur.-publishes-revised-general-chapter-3.2.1.-glass-containers-for-pharmaceutical-use-in-pharmeuropa-37.3